We traveled through Echo canyon on the Echo Canyon Road which parallels the I80 freeway. This is where Great Great Grandfather Isaac helped build and man breastworks made of stones while defending Salt Lake from the federals who were coming as part of the Utah War. It is hard to see the breatworks from below, but they are there someplace.
Topics that interest me include, California Mormon history, Mormon Handcart history, WWII history, Civil War history
Labels
- 9/11
- Abraham Lincoln
- Adolf Hitler
- African American History
- Argentina
- Bear Flag Revolt
- Bear River Battle
- Book Review
- Book of Mormon
- Brigham Young
- California History
- California Indians
- California Missions
- Civil War
- Donner Party
- Emancipation Proclamation
- English history
- Eva Peron
- Frederick Douglass
- Gettysburg
- Gettysburg Address
- Ghost Dance
- Gold Star Mothers
- Halloween
- Hyrum Crusader
- Hyrum Utah
- Inca
- Isaac Wardle
- Jewish Holocaust
- Joseph Smith
- Ken Burns
- Korean War
- Manteca
- Martin Handcart Company
- Memorial Day
- Mormon Battalion
- Mormon Trail
- Mormon handcart rescuers
- Mormon history
- Mormon music
- Mormon pioneers
- Mormons
- Mormons in England
- Native American Art
- Native American History
- Native American Prophecies
- Native American Prophets
- Native American biographies
- Native Americans
- New Hope
- Olympics
- Pearl Harbor
- Pioneers
- Railroad
- Reorganized Church
- San Joaquin
- San Joaquin City
- San Joaquin River
- South Jordan
- Sports
- The West
- The church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- U.S. History
- U.S. Navy
- Utah history
- WWI
- WWII
- archeology
- assassination
- basketball
- biography
- cache valley
- civil rights
- documentary
- emancipation
- ghost towns
- gold rush
- handcart companies
- handcart pioneer
- handcart rescuers
- historical documentary
- historical reenactment
- motivational movies
- movie review
- music
- philately
- sports movies
- weapons
- women
Showing posts with label Isaac Wardle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Isaac Wardle. Show all posts
Monday, August 24, 2026
Tuesday, September 8, 2020
Isaac's History
After many years I have finally finished the history of my great great Grandfather Isaac John Wardle. He was a handcart pioneer with the Martin Handcart Company. If you are interested in a bound copy they will be $30 for printing etc.. Message me and I will let you now where to send check.
If interested in an email copy message me with email address and I will send in word and pdf files. If you respond to this post with you email address that will also work.
Monday, November 2, 2015
Mormon History: Essay on Polygamy
Isaac Wardle History: Chapter Thirteen: Polygamy
Chapter Thirteen: Polygamy
“I could get you all wives” (Wardle, Isaac, letter 1879)
Should each prove true their work to do
Like true and faithful wives
Then all shall share, my love and care
With crowns of endless lives. . . . . . (Johnson)
The church espoused polygamy. There are reports of the doctrine having been received as early as 1831, and practiced among church leaders from as early as the early 1840s. This is based on a revelation given to Joseph Smith, and recorded in 1843 D&C 132:
30 Abraham received promises concerning his seed, and of the fruit of his loins—from whose loins ye are, namely, my servant Joseph—which were to continue so long as they were in the world; and as touching Abraham and his seed, out of the world they should continue; both in the world and out of the world should they continue as innumerable as the stars; or, if ye were to count the sand upon the seashore ye could not number them.
31 This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham, and the promise was made unto Abraham; and by this law is the continuation of the works of my Father, wherein he glorifieth himself.
32 Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham; enter ye into my law and ye shall be saved.
33 But if ye enter not into my law ye cannot receive the promise of my Father, which he made unto Abraham.
…61 And again, as pertaining to the law of the priesthood—if any man espouse a virgin, and desire to espouse another, and the first give her consent, and if he espouse the second, and they are virgins, and have vowed to no other man, then is he justified; he cannot commit adultery for they are given unto him; for he cannot commit adultery with that that belongeth unto him and to no one else.
62 And if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified.
The leaders of the Church began this practice before Joseph Smith was killed, but it was not public. It was made public in 1852. “On August 29, 1852, at a general conference of Mormons in Salt Lake City, the church leadership publicly acknowledged plural marriage for the first time. Orson Pratt, a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, delivered a lengthy discourse, inviting the members to "look upon Abraham's blessings as your own, for the Lord blessed him with a promise of seed as numerous as the sand upon the seashore." After Pratt finished, Young read aloud Smith's revelation on plural marriage. (Roberts 2) "Pratt announced that he had unexpectedly been called upon to address the crowd on the subject of 'plurality of lives.' Denying that the practice had been instituted to 'gratify the carnal lusts and feelings of man,' he argued that its chief purpose was to provide righteous men and women the opportunity to have 'a numerous and faithful posterity to be raised up and taught in the principles of righteousness and truth.’” (Van Wagoner)
That the Saints might take more than one wife was not publicly announced until 1852; but it was included in a revelation at least nine years earlier. The original teaching on this subject was a simple revival of the practice of polygamy by Old Testament Patriarchs; which had been sanctioned by God. (Taylor, P.A.M. p 10)
Polygamy was openly taught in the churches in England after this time. “At this time polygamy was taught in all their churches.” (Goodaker, BYU) The announcement was made public in England before Isaac emigrated.
There were two basic tenants of how polygamy worked. The first is that entry into a polygamous relationship was a very serious manner, and was through personal and church revelation. (See Van Wagoner p 3) The second is that entry into a polygamous relationship required approval of church leadership. "Some men entered plural marriage because they were asked to do so by Church leaders, while others initiated the process themselves; all were required to obtain the approval of Church leaders before entering a plural marriage." (lds.org/plural marriage) "Sometimes a man might take a new wife due to personal inspiration, the sense that God desired it. But as frequently a more highly ranked officer in the church might take him aside and note that his leaders felt the time was right for him to take another wife." (Bowman p 129)
Church leadership was sometimes a reason to practice polygamy. However, entry into polygamy was not a requirement for leadership positions. With the exception of general authorities and stake officers, both polygamous and monogamous men were called to different leadership roles. (Embry chart p 111)
The Millennial Star explained the process of polygamy:
(Extract from the Seer) No man in Utah, who already has a wife, and who may desire to obtain another, has any right to make any propositions of marriage to a lady, until he has consulted the President over the whole Church, and through him, obtains a revelation from God, as to whether it would be pleasing in His sight. If he is forbidden by revelation, that ends the matter; if, by revelation, the privilege is granted, he still has no right to consult the feelings of the young lady, until he has obtained the approbation of her parents, provided they are living in Utah; if their consent cannot be obtained, this also ends the matter. But if the parents or guardians freely give their consent, then he may make propositions of marriage to the young lady; if she refuse these propositions, this also ends the matter; but if she accept, a day is generally set apart by the parties, for the marriage ceremony to be celebrated. It is necessary to state, that before any man takes the least step towards getting another wife, it is his duty to consult the feelings of the wife which he already has, and obtain her consent.
...It is the duty of a man who takes another wife, to look after her welfare and happiness, and to provide for her the comforts of life, the same as for the first. (MS XV 1853 pp 214-15)
Entry into plural marriage was not based on lust, nor even sometimes romance:
For these early Latter-day Saints, plural marriage was a religious principle that required personal sacrifice. Accounts left by men and women who practiced plural marriage attest to the challenges and difficulties they experienced, such as financial difficulty, interpersonal strife, and some wives’ longing for the sustained companionship of their husbands. But accounts also record the love and joy many found within their families. They believed it was a commandment of God at that time and that obedience would bring great blessings to them and their posterity, both on earth and in the life to come. While there was much love, tenderness, and affection within many plural marriages, the practice was generally based more on religious belief than on romantic love. (Lds.org/plural marriage)
Contrary to popular notions about polygamy, the Mormon harem dominated by lascivious males and hyperactive libidos, did not exist. The image of unlimited lust was largely the creation of Gentile travelers to Salt Lake City more interested in titillating audiences back home than in accurately portraying plural marriage. ..Mormon plural marriage, to propagating the species righteously and dispassionately, proved to be a rather drab lifestyle compared to the imaginative tales of polygamy, dripping with sensationalism, demanded by a scandal-hungry eastern media market.
...Brigham Young explained the purposes of plural marriage to a 14 July 1855 Mormon audience: "God never introduced the Patriarchal order of marriage, with a view to please man in his carnal desires, nor to punish females for anything which they had done, but He introduced it for the express purpose of raising up His name a royal Priesthood, a peculiar people."
…Plural wives, like their husbands, viewed polygamy as a practical and honorable means for providing marriage and motherhood to thousands of women who may have otherwise remained unmarried in a monogamous world. Church leaders pronounced over and over that plural marriage countered various social evils. Above all they stressed that the principle was commanded by God to raise a righteous generation. Mormons nearly always entered polygamy because they believed it was essential to their salvation, that God required it of them. ((Van Wagoner Ibid pp 89-90)
The religious reasons were two fold; first to follow the prophet, and second to follow God's command to multiply and replenish the Earth. While it is true, second and third wives had less children than first marriages, the progenitors of a polygamous male was much larger than that of a monogamous male. (Embry p 40)
Open polygamy changed the society in general. Some of these changes were foreseen, including an increase in the fertility rate. Others were not foreseen, such as an alleviation of poverty as widows and lower class women married wealthier men. Another consequence was the lowering of the age of marriage:
While the Mormon marriage system was in place....the church's influence on families was decisive. The influence of plural marriage reached beyond those who entered it. When many women became plural wives, as they did in the late 1850s, the entire marriage market was affected, and the average age of all brides decreased. In addition, the church's lenient divorce policy provided opportunity for women who wished to remarry. Moreover, as the richer men took economically disadvantaged women--the widowed, the divorced and the fatherless--as plural wives, the wealth per capita within families became more evenly distributed. Plural marriage thus supported the goals of the church: it supplied all women who wanted to marry and opportunity to do so; it fostered a more equal distribution of wealth; and it provided aid to financially disadvantaged women by transferring economic resources from wealthier men. (Daynes, pp 13-14)
Almost all Mormon women married during this time. "The demand for wives meant that almost all women married. ...Less than 1 percent of those [Mormon] women never married, in contrast to 7 or 8 percent of women….in the United States more generally. Moreover, immigrant women from Europe in particular generally married within a year of arriving in Utah, nearly half as plural wives." (Bowman p 131)
The change of the Mormon society from a monogamous society to polygamist happened very quickly. There was no established norm. "Since the number of wives permitted was never defined some men married beyond their means. ...Courtship manners were not well established... The rules of wooing depended on the individuals involved: interest could be initiated by the man, the prospective wife, or even the first wife who felt it was her religious obligation to do so." (Van Wagoner p 90)
Polygamy was not the norm among members of the Church:
Although monogamy had been the most common marriage from among Mormons, polygamy was considered the ideal from the mid-1840s to 1890… The standard Mormon explanation is simply that God chose to introduce the practice, as he had in ancient Israel, and he therefore made his well known to his spokesman on earth. However that may be, it is clear that the Prophet typically went to the Lord with problems and then received answers. A naturalistic approach would pay a good deal of attention to the kinds of problems that entered the Prophet’s mind in the first place. Among these might well have been the practical difficulty of providing for all the unmarried females who were attracted to the new religion. (Arrington and Bitton pp 194-95)
Based on the best information now available, we estimate that no more than five percent of married Mormon men had more than one wife.” (ibid p 199)
Other sources indicate the prevalence of polygamy was much higher, and that about half of the church membership lived in a polygamous family, either as a child or married partner. (See Lds.org/plural marriage) Other estimates of the proportion of men involved vary from one-tenth to one-fifth; and exceeding few of them took more than a second wife.” (Taylor, P.A.M. p 68) However polygamy was the norm among the leaders of the church:
In emphasizing how small was the percentage of Mormons, who were directly involved in polygamy it is important to recall that all the central church leaders were polygamists. From the president down through the apostles and the Presiding Bishopric during the period, no general authority was a monogamist; the same was true of most bishops and stake presidents, as well as, for all practical purposes, their counselors. The privilege of polygamy was granted to the pure in heart and hence was a clear sign of worthiness for promotion in the Mormon hierarchy. (Arrington and Bitton p 204)
The rate of polygamous marriages varied greatly from community to community. Some had rates as high as 67 percent, while others as low as 5 percent. “...Polygamous men often married only one additional wife.” (see Van Wagoner p 91) Van Wagoner quotes a study by Stanley Ivins in which two thirds of polygamous men had only two wives. Isaac would represent this group, having only two wives at a time.
Mary AnnAshton
Isaac decided to enter polygamy with a fellow handcart pioneer, Mary Ann Ashton, the daughter of William Ashton who left the handcart company and joined the infantry at Fort Laramie. We can get an idea of Isaac's motives for entering a polygamous relationship from a letter he later wrote while on his mission. "And I was glad to hear that our worthy Bishop William A. Bills and Thomas Jenkins was getting ready to be a partner of Bro George Reynolds and stand up for God and His kingdom on the Earth by taking more wives. I hope that some of the brethren will follow suit. ...I hope that all the good will be married before I come home." (Wardle, Isaac, undated letter)
As noted earlier, entry into a polygamous relationship would imply the consent of the first wife. "Although the first wife's consent was required by scripture, occasionally it was not sought nor freely given." (Embry p 70) There is nothing written nor story told explaining this with regard to Isaac and Martha, but most often the husband approached the first wife and received consent before seeking consent from Church authorities.
It is not known if Isaac was familiar with Mary Ashton on the handcart trek or not. It is impossible to tell if they were in the same ward on the trek, as records were not kept of who was under which captain of 100. However, with the circumstances of Mary's mother passing away on the plains, and their father leaving the company to join the infantry at Fort Laramie, and three sisters passing away on the trip, it is likely Isaac had heard about them. The surviving Ashton girls, Sara and Mary, had been taken in by local church members. There circumstance for the ten years after the trek until they married was not recorded. One family story says they were not always well treated, and were forced to serve families as maids or servants rather than treated as family members. Isaac in marrying Mary, and Thomas Beckstead in marrying Sarah were rescuing them from a bad situation. (As related at Isaac Wardle reunion June 2010.) Thomas married Sarah Ashton a few years before Isaac married Mary. “Thomas W. Beckstead, sixth child of Alexander and Catherine Beckstead, was born April 27, 1833. Homesteaded in 1859. Thomas married (2) Sarah Ellen Ashton on January 30, 1864. In 1887 the Thomas Beckstead family moved to Whitney, Idaho, where they lived the rest of their lives. Thomas passed away September 21, 1893, and Sarah died January 18, 1912.” (Bateman p 65)
Isaac married Mary Ashton in August or September of 1867. (Family Search has the date 14 August, Mary Rupp as 23 September and Ronald Bateman as 14 September.) She was 16 at the time:
How the contact between Isaac and Mary was made the records do not tell. Those were the days of polygamy in the Church. Generally polygamous marriages were made only at the instruction or at least with the permission of the General Authorities of the Church. Nevertheless, in the early fall of 1867, Mary was a young girl just turned sixteen. They were married in Salt Lake City in the Endowment House 14 September 1867. (Wardle, Orrin)
Marrying someone that young was common on the frontier. Also the age difference was also common in marrying a polygamous second wife. "Women did marry at fairly young ages in the first decade of Utah settlement (age 16 or 17 or, infrequently, younger), which was typical of women living in frontier areas at the time." (Lds.org/plural marriage) Well more than half of women married before age 20. The age difference between husband and wife usually increased with second or third marriages. Also the number of children usually decreased with subsequent marriages. (See Embry, charts pp 35-37)
Courtship was quite different during this time. It was less often based pm romantic love and was usually shorter. The motivation for courtship was often religious. (Embry p 40) In this case, it may have also been a practical solution for Mary to leave a situation where she was being taken advantage of and was possible bordering on being abusive.
"Marital love was not seen as something held exclusively for one person. Learning to work together for common goals including the ultimate reward, eternal life, was more important than physical attraction. ...With this attitude about love, nineteenth-century "dating" in monogamous and polygamous marriages was much different from today. ...These courtships were very short, and by our standards quite formal." (Embry p 40)
Mary lived in the same home as Isaac's first wife and her two children, Isaac John Jr. and Crilla. It was common for the second wife to initially stay in the same home as the first wife and husband. "Often the wives shared a home just after the second marriage, but as soon as it was financially possible, the husband provided a separate one for each wife. (Embry p 73) Family roles would have been similar to that in a monogamous families with the only benefit being a sharing of some of the household chores. (ibid p 89) During this time a second daughter was born to Martha, Araminta born 25 April, 1868, (Family Search) Generally wives shared responsibility for newborn babies, or helped with the other children while the birth mother attended to the new born.
A year and a half after her marriage, April 5 1869 Mary gave birth to William Haston. Mary would not survive childbirth as she passed away. (Rupp) “Isaac married Mary Ann Ashton in the Endowment House on September 14, 1867. She too had traveled across the plains in the Martin Handcart Company. Mary Ann died four hours after giving birth to their only child, William Haston Wardle. She was buried in South Jordan.” (Bateman p 70) Uncle Orrin wrote:
Mary’s life was not to last much longer. When she gave birth to her first and only son, William Haston Wardle, on 5 April 1869, there were complications and she died only four hours after her only son came into this life. It should be noted that Isaac apparently gave the young son a name after his maternal [the son’s] grandfather, only he heard the pronunciation of his wife’s maiden name as Haston rather than Ashton. (Wardle, Orrin)
Mary likely was attended by the Relief Society President, who was also a local midwife:
Ann Harrison Holt was a remarkable individual who served as a nurse, doctor, and midwife. She also gave blessings by laying hands on patients’ heads and pronouncing words of comfort and healing. … Ann Holt delivered five hundred babies in the southern part of the Salt lake Valley. She cared for innumerable sick people and stayed an hour or a day, depending on their needs. Many times she cared for a mother and her baby for ten days in a row. … She served as ward Relief Society president from 1869 until her death in 1901, a period of thirty-two years. (Bateman pp 43-44)
Ann Harrison Holt: Ann was a midwife who delivered more than 500 babies in the south valley area. For a time, she was the only midwife and doctor between South Jordan and Point of the Mountain. She had received her training in England. (ibid p 86)
The relief society was responsible to sit with the dead. This included preparing the body for burial:
One responsibility of the ward Relief Society was to help prepare the dead for burial. They helped by washing the bodies and then placing quart bottle of crushed ice around them to retard decay. Saltpeter dissolved in water was used to bathe the face to keep it looking nice. “Sitting with the dead” was a common practice in which two or more people sat with the body all night and replaced the ice as needed to preserve it. This was often done in the parlor of the family home. Burial clothes were made by hand, as were the caskets. (Bateman p 44)
This gives us some idea of the process Mary’s body would have gone through before her burial at South Jordan Cemetery. She is buried in the middle, towards the back of the cemetery, with her in-laws close by.
Sophia Meyers
Isaac did not remain long without a second wife. “Isaac married Sophia Meyers in the Endowment House on July 26, 1869. Their children included Charles M., Hannah M., Atheamer M., and Wilford Woodruff Wardle.” (Bateman p 70)
Isaac made Sophia a separate home on the same homestead, close to Martha's. (Isaac Wardle reunion) However when it was built, and if she always stayed there I am not certain. She did not have a separate home after the family moved to Idaho.
A polygamous family had some things in common with other families and other things were different. There was not always a clear distinction as to who parented who. In Isaac’s case, Sophia took the major role of parenting William. I have an original photo of Sophia and her family. William is included in this picture. Children however had relationships with both parents. In a letter Sophia wrote to Isaac while he was on his mission, we get a glimpse of their family life. While Martha was tending baby Junius, Sophia helped with her next youngest child Silas, “Little Silas is calling me to come to bed so goodnight and God Bless you.” (Wardle, Sophia, letter August 6, 1879)
Because a woman did not have her husband fulltime, this could lead to jealousies, or feelings of loneliness. "Church leaders, recognizing the emotional trauma that polygamy could induce, encouraged plural wives to focus their attentions on their children and on church and community activities." (Van Wagoner p 102)
Loneliness could be a byproduct of a polygamous family, whether for the husband or one of the wives; "especially when the husband was at another home." (Embry 130) "While plural wives experienced loneliness when their husbands were gone….the wives worked closely together in common interests." (ibid p 133) In Isaac's family, the common interests were the garden and the orchard. These would have been the responsibility of the wives while Isaac tended sheep. "Religious commitment was a major incentive for the wives to work together closely." (ibid p 139-140)
The admission that polygamy introduced trials is a clue that it often led to heartache and suffering. The initial discussion between husband and wife presented opportunities for misunderstanding and tears. If there was agreement that another wife would enter the family, deciding just who it would be presented other grounds for bickering. Once the new wife was in the home, the wisdom of a Solomon was required to prevent jealousy from developing. Who would do what chores? Who would accompany the husband to church meetings? To the theater? How much time would he spend with each? Possibilities of friction led those who could afford it to build separate houses, and when polygamists were prosecuted, it became prudent to maintain households in different settlements. Spending alternate nights or alternate weeks with each family was a common method of attempting to be fair to both wives, but even here there were practical obstacles. After passage of the Edmonds Act, whether admitted or not, the fact that only the first wife had married status in the eyes of the federal law gave her an advantage over the others. And although in theory all wives (as well as children) were equal, jealousies between different families could easily make the plural families feel like second-class citizens. (Arrington and Bitton p 202)
Embry points out that the relationship between spouses in a polygamous family could take on three patterns, mother daughter type pattern if there was a great difference in age, a sisterly pattern, or that of friends. (See Embry pp 139) In reading the letters Sophia wrote, it would appear Sophia and Martha took the role of close friends or sisters. In the case of Martha and Sophia, Sophia was literate and Martha was not. Sophia would write the letters to her husband, and provide comments as requested by Martha.
Being involved in a polygamous relationship required personal growth. "Living in polygamy and overcoming natural jealousies and selfishness took considerable effort." (ibid p 128) One sister, Mary Jane Jones, would say:
Polygamy was a great trial to any woman. And it was just as hard for the man. He had to learn to adjust to his women and his troubles were worsened by the women having to learn to adjust too. ...Polygamy was a great principle and we were taught to believe in it. I know that it does bring added blessings if one lives it the best she knows how. It makes one more unselfish and more willing to see and understand other people. After you learn to give in and consider other people, it makes you less selfish in all your relations. I never wanted polygamy, but I don't regret that I lived it. (As quoted in Embry pp 187-88)
Additional hands made for less work for all. This included additional wives as well as children. "Since the women made all the food from scratch and clothing by hand, extra hands made the load for each individual lighter and there was usually plenty for everyone to do." (ibid p 94)
Children sometimes referred to their mothers through polygamy as aunts, and sometimes as mother. (See Embry p 164) Although Sophia took the mothering role for William after she married Isaac, William had positive relationships with both Sophia’s and Martha’s children. William is in several family pictures, some in the primary family group, but others with siblings across groups. This gives an indication that the sons of equal age were very close. (I have a portrait of William with Charles and Joseph from three different wives.)
There were a couple of circumstances that lead to supportive roles for Isaac's wives. While Isaac was on his mission, based on the letters Isaac received, particularly that of Henry Beckstead, it appears both wives were living together. (Beckstead, Henry, letter) Also when either wife was pregnant, or with a baby, the other wife would provide extra support. (See Martha's letters) This was a common reaction in polygamous families. "Moments of need--particularly those related to health--usually saw extra helpfulness." (Embry p 147) Jessie Embry comes close to describing the relationship between Martha and Sophia:
Although any given set of human relationships is complex, the relationship of plural wives, though sometimes strained, was surprisingly rewarding in many cases. Motivated to accept polygamy as a religious practice, plural wives tried hard to treat each other with respect and love. ...There were jealousies, but the women learned to overcome, deal with, or suppress them, and still love each other. Relationships changed, especially with childbirth and sickness, and brought the women closer together. (ibid p 149)
Gentile Reaction
The general population of the United States abhorred polygamy. "The reactions from outside the Church to Pratt's announcement and subsequent statements about polygamy were immediate and negative. In 1854 the Republican Party termed polygamy and slavery the 'twin relics of barbarism'" (ibid p 8)
Polygamy became a source of contention between the Mormon Church and those the Mormons considered “gentiles:”
Of plural marriage, little need be said. American feelings of horror and fascination were stirred up again and again by books written by outsiders or deserters to expose all that was bad in Mormonism. The fact that plural marriage was never practiced by more than a minority of Saints, the existence of Church supervision rather than personal caprice as the controlling force, the sobriety of most Mormon family life, were all overlooked; and for many Americans Utah became a society in which, to gratify the lusts of elderly hypocrites, maidens were daily torn by authority from young men of their choice, who suffered coercion or worse. (Taylor, P.A.M. p 68)
A review of newspapers of the period gives an idea of the enmity in the non-Mormon community towards Mormons and polygamy:
Thousands of female dupes, are annually brought over to the Salt Lake Zion. Rochester U.S. Herald
This Church of Latter-day Lepers sends its procurers abroad under the protection of our flag, and fills it harems with victims duped with the promise freedom--the most flagrant crime perpetrated today in the name of liberty. New York Herald
Another squad of Mormon tramps left the city yesterday to rope the ignorant classes into the Latter-day fraud. Salt Lake Tribune, June 1 1881 (Jarman)
Morrill Act
The Morrill Act was passed in 1862. This act, "prohibited plural marriage in the territories, disincorporated the Church, and restricted the Church's ownership of property to $50,000." (Embrey p 8) However this law was not really enforced as the government was focused on the Civil War.
In 1867 the Utah Territory asked for the repeal of this law. However the governmental reaction was to seek even more strict laws with regards to polygamy. The Cullom Bill was introduced to strengthen control over the territories. This bill passed the House of Representatives but not the Senate. (Polygamy Faq)
Mormon women let their voices be heard on the subject. “An early public mention of South Jordan regarding polygamy was in the Deseret Evening News of January 13 1870. The article stated that twenty-five thousand ladies voluntarily assembled in mass protests against legislation designed to suppress “patriarchal marriage.” South Jordan was one of the principal settlements where such a mass meeting was held.” (Bateman p 167) “1870: “Indignation meeting” held by South Jordan women to protest anti-polygamy in U.S. Congress. (ibid p 242)
"The Mormons continued to practice polygamy despite these laws since they believed they were protected by the freedom of religion clause in the Bill of Rights." (Embrey p 9) In 1879, while Isaac was serving his mission, the Supreme Court ruled that laws against polygamy were constitutional. Bishop Bills talked about a meeting in Salt Lake that many from South Jordan attended, to show their support for polygamy and against the persecution that the Saints were enduring. “We have had a Grand Demonstration in Salt Lake City to welcome President D H Wells back on his return from the Penitentiary as he was fined for contempt of court one hundred dollars and two days imprisonment for not revealing the secrets of the Endowment House. Most of our Ward went…” (Bills) The persecution was very heavy and burdensome, starting before Isaac left on his Mission. Bishop Bills wrote to Isaac. “The news that I selected for you contains more news and rascality from our enemies than any other paper ever published.” (Bills)
Isaac got some idea of the changed atmosphere that took place while he was on his mission to England upon his return home while traveling through New York. (See chapter 13.) A New York reporter confronted them ( See New York Times 1879) about efforts of the State Department with regards to asking other countries to prohibit Mormons from immigrating to the U.S. because of their belief in Polygamy. Secretary of State Evart had written a form letter to go to other countries. "It is not doubted, therefore, that when the subject is brought to its attention, the government of ___ ___ will take such steps as may be compatible with its laws and usages to check the organization [Mormon Church] of these criminal enterprises by agents who are thus operating beyond the reach of the law of the United States and to prevent the departure of those proposing to come hither as violators of the law by engaging in such criminal enterprises by whomsoever instigated." (U.S. Department of State 1879) No foreign government saw a way to comply with this request.
The atmosphere and persecution of polygamist families Isaac met upon his return home, was different from when he left.
After the U.S. Supreme Court found the anti-polygamy laws to be constitutional in 1879, federal officials began prosecuting polygamous husbands and wives during the 1880s. Believing these laws to be unjust, Latter-day Saints engaged in civil disobedience by continuing to practice plural marriage and by attempting to avoid arrest. When convicted, they paid fines and submitted to jail time. To help their husbands avoid prosecution, plural wives often separated into different households or went into hiding under assumed names, particularly when pregnant or after giving birth. (Lds.org/plural marriage)
The Edmunds Act
The Edmunds Act calling for more severe penalties was passed in 1882. It increased the penalty for polygamy, but also added a misdemeanor, unlawful co-habitation which was easier to prove. "Soon after the Edmunds Act passed, federal marshals began to enter Utah in force, and the period the Mormons called 'the Raid' began. ...By 1886 every Mormon settlement in Utah had been visited and its people questioned." (Bowman):
As the legal wheels set in motion by the Edmunds Act began to turn slowly, disruption of Mormon life became extensive. Scores of federal marshals were brought into the territory to conduct "cohab hunts," and bounties were offered for information leading to the arrest of polygamists. Mormons not wishing to give up their plural wives and children faced dismal options--legal prosecution, a life in hiding on the "Mormon underground," or complete exile. Despite the bravado demonstrated by the "cohabs," as the polygamists were called, those who did not submit to arrest had to be constantly on the move.
Many Mormon men on the underground hid near or within their own homes. Hidden compartments and cellars--"polygamy pits" as they were called--secreted men who had scurried for cover when an unexpected knock was heard at the parlor door. (Van Wagoner pp 118-19)
The Edmunds Act also questioned the citizenship of the polygamist:
.
...Starting in 1862, and again in 1882 and 1887, anti-polygamy laws were enacted in the U.S. Congress. Each succeeding law was harsher than the preceding one. The Edmunds Act of 1882 provided for a stiff fine plus imprisonment of polygamists. It also took away the right to vote, hold public office, or trial by jury. The law took away the U.S. citizenship of violators. Consequently, federal marshals were sent to Utah to hunt and prosecute polygamists with the purpose of incarcerating them. The marshals were awarded a twenty-dollar bounty for every polygamist they arrested which was an added incentive. Also, all local and state public officials were replaced by federal appointees brought in from the East. In addition, the Edmunds-Tucker Act of 1887 resulted in the seizure of all church-owned property. The Mormons felt they were again under extreme persecution. They had suffered greatly in both Illinois and Missouri and had migrated to the West to escape the persecution. (Bateman p 166)
One can only imagination how Isaac would have felt at being stripped of the right to vote, or hold public office. Isaac also would have felt the pressure of federal marshals who searched for polygamists.
The Edmunds law did not stop polygamy. The Mormon men went into hiding, and if they were sent to prison would come home as folk heroes after serving their term. Consequently a more severe Edmunds Tucker Act passed in 1887. This law "required plural wives to testify against their husbands, dissolved the Perpetual Emigrating [Fund], abolished the Nauvoo Legion, and provided a mechanism for acquiring the property of the Church." (Embrey p 10)
The Edmunds Tucker Act also indicated that only children of the first wife were entitled to inheritance. Isaac however planned for this and left a will with all of his children receiving inheritace. (See chapter fifteen.)
“Federal marshals harassed the polygamists of South Jordan during the 1880s as they did elsewhere in the territory…. Even after the 1890 Manifesto whereby the church outlawed polygamy, the marshals continued to hunt for polygamist for several more years. Finally, under threat of excommunication, most stopped the practice. (Bateman p 167) One particular story of this harassment was that of the Bishop:
In 1886, the federal marshals, who were searching for Mormon polygamists, came looking for “Billie Bills,” as they called him. Joseph Thomas Hutchings was approached by the marshals, who mistook him for Bishop Bills. Fortunately, Mr. Hutchings was acquainted with one of the marshals, Frank Drier. Joseph warned the bishop, who escaped via an irrigation ditch and hid in Hutchings’s straw stack for three days. Mrs. Hutchings supplied him with food and water during the time he was hiding.
Thereafter, Bishop Bills built a room in the loft of his barn to hide in when harassed by the marshals. He had a bed, a chair, and a table he used for a desk. When the marshals came looking for him, Bishop Bills hid in the secret room. It was so carefully constructed that no one but the bishop could find the entrance.
A raid undertaken in South Jordan on April 6, 1887, searched the houses of Isaac J. Wardle, J.W. Winward, Henry Beckstead, and William A. Bills. John W. Winward was arrested but was released when the marshal stated that a mistake had been made. Alex Bills (William A. Bill’s son) and Henry Beckstead were arrested and posted fifteen hundred dollars’ bond. Alexander and Henry were arraigned in the Third District Court, September 22, 1887, on charges of unlawful cohabitation, the which they pleaded guilty. Alexander was asked if it was his intention to obey the law against cohabitation in the future. His matter-of-fact reply was, “No, sir; it is not.” (Bateman p 93)
As indicated above the marshals were looking for Isaac in 1887. An indictment was placed against him in 1887, and we was actually arrested in 1890:
Isaac J. Wardle of South Jordan was arrested Wednesday, June 4 at his home by Deputy Marshal Doyle, on a charge of unlawful cohabitation. He was brought to the city and taken before Commissioner Greenman and bound over for trial at the September term on an indictment found against him April 23, 1887. Geo. A. Lowe and S.P. Teasdel are his bondsmen. (The Deseret Weekly, Volume 40 p 824)
The Manifesto
The Church issued the Manifesto in 1890, withdrawing support for polygamy. After this time, very few new plural marriages were performed. President Woodruff explained, "This Manifesto only refers to future marriages and does not affect past conditions. I did not, could not, and would not promise [the nation] that you would desert your wives and children. This you cannot do in honor. (Van Wagoner p 145) However even this statement was confusing to some members, as President Woodruff testified in court, "I intended the proclamation to cover the ground, to keep the law." However he further explained "he was placed in such a position on the witness stand that he could not answer other than he did. Yet any man who deserts and neglects his wives or children because of the Manifesto, should be handled on his membership." (Embrey p 13, quoting President Woodruff)
Consequently, the polygamist family was left with dual messages, and the individual family confronted the Manifesto and the new laws in many ways. Some families chose to separate, the husband generally living with the first wife, and the second wife living elsewhere, often in another town. The husband would visit only occasionally, like for conference or when in the area on business. Some chose to leave the state and even the country, moving to Arizona, Mexico or Canada. Isaac chose to stay with his wives, and attempted to use the underground. The federal marshals only had jurisdiction in the territories. For this reason, polygamists would sometimes move to the states. Isaac did eventually move his family to Idaho, perhaps to be farther from the marshals. He also disappeared for a time, perhaps trying to stay ahead of the marshals. (See chapter sixteen.)
Isaac had affection for both of his wives (Martha and Sophia after Mary had passed away.) This is expressed in his missionary letters he sent to his family from England. “Dear Wives, it with love and affection that I set down to write to you and my dear children.” (Wardle, Isaac, letter Feb. 17, 1879)
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
The Utah War
Chapter Eleven: In Utah
“Took an active part in the Echo Canyon trouble.”
A Song for 1858 (to the tune “a man’s a man for a’ that”)
Who in
all Deseret’s afraid
Of Uncle
Sam of a’ that?
His
wond’rous power, his great parade
Of
soldiers, arms and a’ that;
And a’
that, and a’ that,
His
wisdom, wealth, and a’ that;
‘Gainst
Mormon right, be long may fight,
And yet
be fooled, for a’ that.
A Lion
couches in the path,
And
tigers firce, and a’ that,
Let dogs
beware, lest in their wrath,
They be
devoured, and a’ that.
And
a’that, and a’ that,
Though
numerous, and a’ that;
The
Lion’s roar can chase five score
Back in
dismay, and a’ that!
The
elements themselves have joined
The
Mormon side, and a’ that,
Old
Uncle’s truly growling blind,
Good
faith, he never saw that;
And a’
that, and a’ that
And
better still than a’ that—
The God
of power directs our course,
And says
we’ll win, and a’ that.
With
pride we view those mountains round,
That
cleave the sky, and a’ that;
Staunch
guards of liberty they’re found,
Of virtue,
truths, and a’ that.
And a’
that, and a’ that,
God
placed them there, and a’ that;
On their
high peaks our banners fly,
Our
chieftains stand, and a’ that.
Hail to
the land where freedom reigns,
Where
prophets rule, and a’ that;
Where
sense and worth alone obtains
And
honored seat, and a’ that.
And a
that, and a’ that,
We’ve
found it here, and a’ that;
Though
hell without be moved to foam,
Here’s
peace and bliss for a’ that!
(Rowan, Mathew, South Cottonwood, Jan. 1, 1958.)
When immigrants arrived in Salt Lake, they
were warmly welcomed. “Whether they
arrived by wagon, handcart, or railroad, the immigrants were greeted warmly in
Utah. Many were eagerly awaited by
relatives who had come to Zion and sent back money for their families. Those who arrived without prior arrangements
could still look forward to excellent treatment from their ‘brothers and
sisters in the gospel.’” (Arrington and
Bitton p 35) In Isaac’s case, as
previously mentioned, he was taken into a home and provided for. “Brethren and Women came to welcome us and
took us into their homes, fed and warmed us and gave us warm clean beds to rest
our weary bodies.” (Wardle, Isaac CH)
The territory of Utah was one of
industriousness. Idleness was not
tolerated:
The
kingdom must rise on its own economic foundations. Labor was its chief virtue, and the
development of home industry its only salvation. The building of Zion must be sustained by
unceasing industry and Brigham Young meant to see that it was so. A group of idlers about the court house in
the capital city may have forgotten this.
If so they were soon reminded, after Brigham passed that way. He was quick to diagnose the symptoms and
apply the remedy. A clerk appeared among
them to take their names and soon each one of them received a call to take a
“mission” for the Kingdom; some were to raise cotton in Southern Utah, some to
make new settlements elsewhere in the Territory, and some to convert the
heathen in the South Sea Islands. The
drone had no place in Deseret. (Larson p
94)
When Isaac arrived in Salt Lake, the city held
about 15,000 residents. (See Piercy p
185) Piercy quoted a couple descriptions
of the people in the valley:
General
Wilson, Navy Agent at San Francisco, who passed through the city to California,
in writing to Hon. Trueman Smith, expressed himself concerning the citizens as
follows—“A more orderly, honest, industrious, and civil people I have never
been among than these. I have not met in
a citizen, a single idler, or any person who looks like a loafer. There is a spirit and an energy in everything
you see that cannot be equaled in any city of any size that I have ever
seen.” This was quoted in a speech by
Mr. Smith in the United States Senate in 1850.
Mr. Fuller, Editor of the New York Mirror, who has also visited the
city, writes in his paper thus—“A more industrious, honest, law-abiding
community can hardly be found. The
municipal regulations of Salt Lake City are admirable, and more moral (barring
their open polygamy) and orderly citizens, we have never seen in any part of
the world. They number very many men of
intelligence and education, and a residence of several weeks among them failed
to note a single vagabond in their midst.
They are exceedingly hospitable to California emigrants, and furnish
them supplies at reasonable rates.”
(Piercy p 112)
Isaac became associated with the Beckstead
family. “Grandfather went to West Jordan
to work for and make his home with the family of Alex Beckstead Sr.” (Rupp) “Mr. Wardle went to West Jordan to work for Alexander Beckstead’s
family. (Bateman p 6)
If this is the family where Isaac first went
to stay after crossing the plains, I don’t know, but there was a Beckstead
among the rescuers of the Handcart Companies.
(See Broomhead, CH) By early
spring, as soon as he recuperated, he went to work for Alex Beckstead in the
West Jordan area. (Wardle, Orrin) He was use to hard labor, and not one to
shirk from the same. A fellow handcart
pioneer, while recuperating from the journey, in a letter to his parents in
England made this comment, “I believe this to be about the worst place for idle
or lazy people to come to.” (Bleak, Ch
1)
Utah War
The Utah War had been brewing for some time, more than
ten years, since the saints had left for Utah.
“For many Americans, the Mormon kingdom, with its polygamy and perceived
hostility to outsiders, was an abomination. … Inflamed by exaggerated charges
from disgruntled official and dissidents newly returned from Utah, the nation
demanded action.” (Parshall) Brigham Young had asked for ten years without
outside influence, and he was given ten years to the day:
On the 24th
of July last, a number of us went to Big Cottonwood Canyon, to pass the
anniversary of our arrival into this Valley.
Ten years ago the 24th of July last, a few of the Elders
arrived here and began to plough and to plant seeds, to raise food to sustain
themselves. Whilst speaking to the
brethren of the day, I said, inadvertently.
If the people of the United States will let us alone for ten years, we
will ask no odds of them; and ten years form that very day, we had a message by
brothers Smoot, Stoddard, and Rockwell, that the Government had stopped the
mail, and that they had ordered 2,500 troops to come here and hold the
“Mormons” still. (Young, Journal of
Discourses 5:226, Sept. 1857)
Prejudice against
the Mormons had been slowly building. “Through the mid-1850s,
federal appointees returned to the East frustrated or intimidated or both, and
some of them wrote books or articles about their travails. Anti-Mormon
sentiment spread, inflamed particularly by reports of polygamy. (Roberts
2) Two issues predominated--polygamy and
control of the government. (See CES p 368)
Although conflict between the Mormons and federal
officials was common, Judge William W. Drummond was a particular problem. He was disliked by the Mormons as he
threatened to close the probate court system and had bought a mistress instead
of his wife to Salt Lake City. He caused
that his man servant should whip a member who had said something about his
character, and a warrant was issued for his arrest. He escaped to California and then to New
Orleans. He said “the Mormons had
destroyed the territorial supreme court records, their leaders were disrespectful
of federal officials, a secret oath-bound band operated in Utah that knew no
law save Brigham Young’s, the Mormons and not the Indians had massacres John W.
Gunnison’s surveying party in 1854, and a state of rebellion existed in Utah. Unfortunately Drummond’s charges were
believed.” (CES p 369)
Another concern for non-Mormons was the possible
allegiance between the Mormons and Native Americans:
But by 1857,
non-Mormon newspapers from New York to California had begun reporting that the
Mormons were seeking the Indians' allegiance in case of a clash with the United
States. Some accounts were based on briefings from officials who had returned
to Washington; others, based on gossip, tended toward a more alarmist tone. For
example, on April 20, 1857, the National Intelligencer, a Washington
newspaper, put the number of the Mormons' Indian allies at 300,000, even though
the total Indian population of the Utah Territory appears to have been 20,000
at most. Young would characterize press coverage generally as "a prolonged
howl of base slander." (Roberts 2)
Utah
citizens were also upset. “Had not
Washington inflicted corrupt officers upon Utah? … Utah’s settlers did lack
government services provided to others: reliable mail, land ownership and
protection from Indians. (Parshall) The citizens of Utah demanded statehood or
independence.
President Buchanan reacted to this demand in
a strong way. “In 1857, President James
Buchanan, for political reasons, decided to replace Brigham Young as acting
governor of the Utah Territory.
Anticipating the Mormon reaction, Buchanan ordered an Army force of 2500
soldiers, under the command of Brevet General Albert Sidney Johnson, to Utah to
ensure that his orders were carried out.
Young responded by calling out the Utah Territorial Militia (also known
as the Nauvoo Legion) and placed the territory on a war footing.” (U.S. Department of the Interior)
A Mormon summary of the reason for the conflict was
written in this manner:
In 1857 Utah territory was invaded by a
hostile force of American soldiery. The
events and influences that led to this confrontation are difficult to
establish. The conflict was triggered in
1855 when David H. Burr, a non-Mormon appointed to be surveyor general of the
territory, found his work impeded by Saints understandably anxious about any
official survey of lands that they possessed only by right of occupation, not
by any explicit declaration or approval of Congress. Burr and his assistants left the territory
and reinforced the reports of Mormon skullduggery already prevalent in
Washington. Garland Hurt, an energetic
Indian agent, added his disturbing opinion that the Mormons were teaching the
Indians to distinguish between the “Mormonee” and other Americans. Not willing to accept the explanation that
Mormons had to adopt some means of letting the Indians know that they
shouldn’t be held responsible for the brutality practiced by other Americans,
Hurt alleged that the Mormons were planning to employ Native Americans in a war
of vengeance against all non-Mormon settlers and travelers.
Troubles with surveyors and Indian agents
were overshadowed by continuing strife between Mormons and federally appointed
judges. After 1855 the Utah judiciary
was headed by three non-Mormons: W.W. Drummond, George P. Stiles, and John F.
Kinney. While on the surface Kinney was
friendly to the Mormons, he represented them to Washington as being seditious
and unruly. Stiles and Drummond did not
bother to temper their distaste; the latter, especially, came to personify for
the Mormons all the injustices of the territorial system.
… Drummond’s flagrant association with a
prostitute offended the moral sense of the Saints. Perhaps most threatening was his attack on
the probate courts, with Mormon bishops as probate judges, which had ruled on
both civil and criminal cases. At the
time he accused Mormons of destroying court records, an accusation later proved
false. Offensive as his personal
character might have been, Drummond played an important role in sparking the
national reaction to Utah.
…The Mormons had picked an awkward time to
establish their semi-independent kingdom in the West. The issues of slavery and states’ rights were
already dividing the nation. Northerners
wanted to make an example of Mormon rebelliousness, while some Southerners
hoped an anti-Mormon campaign might relieve the pressure on them. One Southern leader wrote to Buchanan urging
a vigorous Utah policy that would “supersede the Negro-mania with the almost
universal excitement of an Anti-Mormon Crusade.” The thousands of European Saints flocking to
Utah made it difficult to ignore the “Mormon problem,” and in fact aroused some
early anti-immigrant nativism.
But such considerations lay in the
background as predisposing conditions.
On the front of the stage Drummnd, Hurt, and others somehow persuaded
Buchanan that the Mormons were in a state of rebellion. They contended that through threats,
boycotts, and murder the Mormon leaders hoped to drive all non-Mormons from the
territory. A stream of newspaper
articles, pamphlets, novels, and public speeches enumerated supposed Mormon
treacheries and called for reprisals as extreme as a holy war of
extermination.
Buchanan and his cabinet officers found
themselves in a climate of public opinion that seemed to support any move to
protect the rights of non-Mormons, suppress Mormon home rule, and eradicate
polygamy. The President became convinced
that a vigorous anti-Mormon action could only be to his credit. By May 1857 he had decided upon a show of
military force as the best and quickest solution. But he seriously underestimated the degree to
which it would be opposed by the Mormons.
In the ensuing two years he found that his solution was anything but
quick, and even the political popularity of a Utah campaign was to prove
disappointing. (Arrington and Bitton)
A big complaint from the Mormon community against
President Buchanan is that he did not investigate, by talking to any of the
Mormons. “Utahns
complained that Buchanan had not investigated charges of violence or judicial
irregularities before sending the army; Buchanan had indeed consulted many who
had been to Utah, but without recognizing that the testimony of failed
officials might be colored by personal resentment. “ (Parshall)
The reaction of the Mormons and their leaders
is that they were being invaded by an outside force. “The issues that has been forced upon us, compels
us to resort to the great first law of self-preservation, and stand in our own
defense and right.” (CES p 370)
The US infantry was delayed in starting:
Indecision,
incompetence, and competition for lucrative contracts surrounded the
preparations of the Utah Expedition. The
first body of soldiers did not leave Fort Leavenworth until mid-July. Others did not straggle out until
September. Within weeks they were
plagued by foul weather and the indecision of their officers. William S. Harney, originally chosen to
command the army, was replaced by Colonel Albert Sidney Johnson. During the winter Johnston engaged in a
running dispute with the newly appointed governor of Utah, Alfred Cumming of
Georgia and Missouri, who accompanied the troops West. The Colonel seemed to be intent on a military
victory over the Mormons, whereas Cumming was primarily concerned with
acceptance of himself as governor.
(Arrington and Bitton)
As previously mentioned, the Mormon leaders learned of
the approach of federal troops at their annual Pioneer day celebration. “Tradition has it
that the Mormons' first hint of trouble came during a Pioneer Day picnic in
Little Cottonwood Canyon, when four horsemen thundered like Paul Revere into
the midst of the party with word that the army was coming.” (Parshall) There was suspicion, but this is the first
actual news of the advance:
Although Mormon leaders had suspected
something was afoot, they first heard of the impending invasion on July 24,
1857, the tenth anniversary of their entrance into the valley. Four dust-covered horsemen galloped into a
festive assembly and announced that a large force of American soldiers was on
its way to install a non-Mormon governor and prevent any further “rebellion.”…
The President had even neglected to send an official communication to Brigham
Young, who, in his own mind still the official governor, chose to regard the
approaching troops as a hostile army invading Utah Territory.
Determined to greet the invaders with force if necessary, The Mormons hoped
to avoid bloodshed with “scorched earth” and harassment policies that would
leave the invaders with a precarious line of supply. Young called out the territorial militia and
asked each community to donate men, firearms and provisions to the
defense. By the fall of 1857 eleven
hundred men were fortifying the mountain passes east of Great Salt Lake. Other parties were dispatched to burn Fort
Bridger and Fort Supply, Mormon-owned outposts at the eastern entrance to the
territory. (Arrington and Bitton)
Isaac
was one of those eleven hundred men called to Echo Canyon to defend against
“invasion.” “In 1857, West Jordan
volunteers took an active part in the Echo Canyon campaign against the invasion
of Johnson's Army.” (West Jordan) “While living there he [Isaac] was called to
go with others to meet Johnston’s Army in Echo Canyon.” (Rupp)
“[Isaac] took an active part in the Echo Canyon trouble.” (Esshom p 1320) “In the later summer of 1857, he was among
the men who were called to meet the invading Johnston’s Army in Echo
Canyon.” (Wardle, Orrin) Mr. Wardle...served in the militia at
Echo Canyon during the Utah War.
(Bateman p 6)
And on Sept. 15, 1857, Young placed Utah
under martial law, requiring passes for all travelers into and out of the
territory and forbidding armed forces from "invading" Utah. (Parshall)
CITIZENS OF UTAH:
We are invaded by hostile forces,
who are evidently assailing us to accomplish our overthrow and destruction.
For the last
twenty-five years we have trusted officials of the government, from Constables
and Justices to Judges, Governors and Presidents, only to be scorned, held in
derision, insulted and betrayed. Our houses have been plundered and then
burned; our fields laid waste, our principal men butchered while under the
pledged faith of the Government for their safety, and our families driven from
their homes to find that shelter in the barren wilderness, and that protection
among hostile savages, which were denied them in the boasted abodes of
Christianity and civilization.
The constitution of our common country guarantees unto us all that we do now or ever claimed.
If the constitutional rights, which pertain unto us as American citizens, were extended to Utah, according to the spirit and meaning thereof, and fairly and impartially administered, it is all that we could ask.
The constitution of our common country guarantees unto us all that we do now or ever claimed.
If the constitutional rights, which pertain unto us as American citizens, were extended to Utah, according to the spirit and meaning thereof, and fairly and impartially administered, it is all that we could ask.
Our opponents have
availed themselves of prejudices existing against us, because of our religious
faith, to send out a formidable host to accomplish our destruction. We have had
no privilege, no opportunity of defending ourselves from the false, foul and
unjust aspersions against us before the Nation. The Government has not
condescended to cause an investigating committee or other person to be sent to
inquire into and ascertain the truth, as is customary in such cases. We know
those aspersions to be false, but that avails us nothing. We are condemned
unheard, and forced to an issue with an armed mercenary mob, which has been
sent against us at the instigation of anonymous letter writers, ashamed to
father the base, slanderous falsehoods which they have given to the public; of
corrupt officials who have brought false accusations against us, to screen
themselves in their own infamy; and of hireling priests and howling editors,
who prostitute the truth for filthy lucre's sake.
The issue which has been thus forced upon us compels us to resort to the great first law of self-preservation, and stand in our own defense, a right guaranteed unto us by the genius of the institutions of our country, and upon which the Government is based.
The issue which has been thus forced upon us compels us to resort to the great first law of self-preservation, and stand in our own defense, a right guaranteed unto us by the genius of the institutions of our country, and upon which the Government is based.
Our duty to our
families requires us not to tamely submit to be driven and slain without an
attempt to preserve ourselves. Our duty to our country, our holy religion, our
God, to freedom and liberty, requires that we should not quietly stand still
and see those fetters forging around, which are calculated to enslave and bring
us into subjection to an unlawful military despotism, such as can only emanate
(in a country of constitutional law) from usurpation, tyranny and oppression.
Therefore, I,
Brigham Young, Governor and Superintendent of Indian Affairs for the Territory
of Utah, in the name of the people or the United States in the Territory of
Utah,
First - Forbid all armed forces of every description from coming into this Territory, under any pretense whatever.
Second - That all the forces in said Territory hold themselves in readiness to march at a moment's notice, to repel any and all such invasion
Third - Martial law is hereby declared to exist in this Territory, from and after the publication of this Proclamation; and no person shall be allowed to pass or repass, into or through, or from this Territory without a permit from the proper officer.
Given under my hand and seal at Great Salt Lake City, Territory of Utah, this fifteenth day of September, A.D. eighteen hundred and fifty seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America, the eighty -second. (Young, Brigham, 2)
First - Forbid all armed forces of every description from coming into this Territory, under any pretense whatever.
Second - That all the forces in said Territory hold themselves in readiness to march at a moment's notice, to repel any and all such invasion
Third - Martial law is hereby declared to exist in this Territory, from and after the publication of this Proclamation; and no person shall be allowed to pass or repass, into or through, or from this Territory without a permit from the proper officer.
Given under my hand and seal at Great Salt Lake City, Territory of Utah, this fifteenth day of September, A.D. eighteen hundred and fifty seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America, the eighty -second. (Young, Brigham, 2)
“General Daniel H. Wells of the Nauvoo Legion sent about
eleven hundred men east to Echo Canyon, which lay on the route through the
mountains to Salt Lake City.”(CES)
“By mid-October the Nauvoo Legion had eleven hundred men under arms in
the mountains and seven hundred men in reserve in Salt Lake. Three thousand more troops could be called up
to defend the canyon on fifteen hours’ notice.”
(Bagley p 182)
The men in Echo Canyon drilled, and prepared defensive
fortifications. “The Nauvoo Legion - Utah's militia - took stock of its armaments,
drilled its units and began fortifying Echo Canyon, the army's presumed route
into the city.” (Parshall) Isaac would have been armed. In the cliffs there are fortifications built
of rock, and other defensive works:
These soldiers built wall and dug trenches
from which they could act as snipers.
They also loosened huge boulders that could easily be sent crashing down
on the moving columns, and they constructed ditches and dams that could be
opened to flood the enemy’s path. (CES)
The Narrows: Near here the Mormons built a huge breastwork and a 500-foot-long rifle pit
(across the freeway, near the base of the telephone pole line). They also put
land mines in this area, made from oak barrels, one-pound cans of powder, and
flintlocks. And they built a big dam here with plans to flood the Narrows and
make it difficult or impossible for the army to get through. Pretty tricky.
In
all, the Mormons built 14 fortifications in this canyon.
Death Rock: … Here the Mormons dug a trench 10’ deep and 7’ wide to
stop the troops’ progress. On the cliff just east of the speed limit sign, you
can spot four foot-tall rock wall fortifications. (Utah)
The
Echo Canyon Breastworks were constructed during the autumn of 1857 under the
direction of General Daniel H. Wells, commander of the Mormon Militia. They
were set atop high cliffs where they would provide the greatest strategic
advantage against possible attack by Johnston's Army during the Utah War
(1857-58). This 2500-man force was sent to the Territory by President James
Buchanan to silence what was perceived to be a rebellion by the Mormons. The
dry masonry walls, constructed of uncut stones, stacked in random courses
without mortar, were 1 to 2 feet above ground and 4 to 12 feet in length. These
fortifications stretched some 1.2 miles along the narrowest section of Echo
Canyon. These Breastworks were part of a larger defensive network that included
plans to dam the creek to force the troops against the canyon wall where the
breastworks are located, and large trenches across the canyon to impede the
passage of horses and men. More than 1200 men worked together completing the
Breastworks on the cliffs in the matter of a few weeks. However, the peaceful
resolution of the Utah War in the early summer of 1858 rendered the
fortifications unnecessary. (Summit County)
The "Echo Fortifications" or the
"Mormon Wall" was built in 1857 as a line of defense against the U.S.
Army led by General Albert S. Johnston, known as Johnston's Army…
Brigham Young sent men into Echo Canyon to
build a line of defense and the Nauvoo Legion was sent into Wyoming to ' harass
and delay" the army. During their harassment tactics, they set fire to and
burned Fort Supply. They drove off several of the horses and mules with the
army. Many more of the animals died during the severe winter. However, General
Johnston lost only one man, and that was from tetanus.
The fortifications were built along the
cliffs of Echo Canyon. Rock fortifications were built among the crevices and
dips of the cliffs. Then cedar trees were cut, the ends painted black to look
like the bore of a cannon, and placed over the top of the fortifications. At
night the men would march around large camp fires to make it seem that there
were more men present than there actually were. The extra guns and ammunition
were buried to prevent them from being exploded by accident or by enemy fire.
The cliffs gave the defenders the advantage of height and better protection. (Utah Travel Council)
Meanwhile, the
Mormons walked a dangerous tightrope.
They worked desperately to stop the army before it could enter the
territory even as they tried to avoid igniting a bloody confrontation that
would lead to war. They implemented a
defensive strategy based on local geography.
There were two practical ways to get the army into Utah, the first
following the main road west through Echo Canyon along the line of present
Interstate 80 and the second and longer route going north to the Oregon Trail
and Soda Springs and the south along the Bear River. On both fronts, the Mormons strengthened
their defenses. They fortified Echo
Canyon, forty-five miles east of Salt Lake, building crude rock breastworks on
top of its steep walls. They damned the
gorge and dug ditches; these improvements might not permit the Saints to drown
Johnston’s men like Pharaoh’s army, but they would let the defenders flood the
road for several miles. (Bagley p 180)
Isaac would have been assigned in help in
these projects. Very likely he was at
the end of a shovel. His experience in
the coal mines would have been useful.
The Echo Canyon Boys would have had their share of danger. There was at least one death. “The cliff
west of the fortifications is called Death Rock. Here a member of the Mormon
militia on the ground aimed his rifle at a friend on the cliff, thinking the
ball could never go that high. The ball hit his friend in the head, killing
him. (Utah) They also had their share of
cold, and would have been a reminder to Isaac of his harrowing experience from
the year before. They were dealing with
“heavy snowfall and intense cold.”
(Wikipedia)
While these preparations were taking place, a small band
of militia, went forward to harass and delay the approaching army:
Rather than engaging the enemy directly,
Mormon strategy was one of hindering and weakening them. Daniel H. Wells,
lieutenant-general of the Nauvoo legion, instructed Major Joseph Taylor:
On
ascertaining the locality or route of the troops, proceed at once to annoy them
in every possible way. Use every exertion to stampede their animals and set
fire to their trains. Burn the whole country before them and on their flanks.
Keep them from sleeping, by night surprises; blockade the road by felling trees
or destroying the river fords where you can. Watch for opportunities to set
fire to the grass on their windward, so as, if possible, to envelop their
trains. Leave no grass before them that can be burned. Keep your men concealed
as much as possible, and guard against surprise. (Wikipedia)
The women and those in
Utah were not without privations as a result of the men being away. “With their men in
the mountains, Mormon women went into the fields to bring in the heaviest
harvest Utah had ever known. (Parshall)
Similar to the handcart companies of the year before, of
which Isaac had been a part, the troops headed to Utah were facing serious
obstacles:
Those forces, assembled at Leavenworth,
Kan., set out for Utah with three major handicaps: First, the army was
essentially without a leader. Its original commander, Gen. William S. Harney,
had been reassigned to quell disturbances in Kansas. The army was under the
temporary command of Col. Edmund Alexander, an ineffectual man called "the
old woman" by his troops.
Second, the army was far below its 2,500-man
allotment. Desertions by those not anxious for a long wilderness march exceeded
even the army's "normal" high desertion rate.
And third, the army left the frontier far
too late to safely cross the Great Plains and the Rocky Mountains. Their
departure date of July 18 was even later than that of the ill-fated Willie
handcart company, whose Mormon pioneers suffered so cruelly on the plains of
Wyoming the year before. Disaster was almost inevitable. (ibid)
The Mormon riders
on the plains, did not make things easier for the approaching troops.
Mormon guerrillas on the Plains burned grass
for miles to weaken its [the army’s] horses, beef cattle and draft animals.
They burned the Mormon outposts of Fort Supply and Fort Bridger to deny the
army convenient shelter. They stampeded cattle and drove off horses and mules.
In one case, the army recalled their mules with a bugle signal, and the
returning animals brought Mormon mounts with them. In the iconic moment of the
Utah War, a band led by Lot Smith burned three federal trains - 78 wagons laden
with food and clothing for the army - after first allowing teamsters to remove
personal belongings. (ibid)
At Simpson’s Hollow, the militia captured
and burned 22 army supply wagons under the leadership of Capt. Lewis Simpson On
October 5. The destruction of this and
two other wagon trains carrying a total of 368,000 pounds of military supplies
and the onset of winter snows which closed the passes to Utah, forced the Army
to spend the winter at the recently burned Fort Bridger. By the spring of 1858, the federal government
and the Mormons had settled most of their differences and Alfred Cumming was
installed as territorial governor. (U.S.
Department of the Interior)
The troops suffered in these conditions. Horses died.
It wasn’t until new leadership arrived that conditions began to improve:
On Nov. 4, the army's new commander, Col.
Albert Sidney Johnston, finally reached his troops. He recognized instantly
that his weakened men could not force their way through Utah's mountains to
take Salt Lake City that season. Instead, he led them to winter quarters,
preparing for a spring campaign and waiting for reinforcements.
The crippled army then endured two weeks of
forced marches toward the blackened walls of Fort Bridger. More animals died of
hunger. A few men, on reduced rations, died of exposure before the army crossed
into Utah (which for several more years still included the southwest corner of
today's Wyoming), and built Camp Scott near old Fort Bridger. (Parshall)
Although they built Camp Scott, the situation was still
not good for the troops:
By November 1857 a
troop of eighteen hundred federal soldiers and camp followers were huddling
around the charred ruins of Fort Bridger, desperately trying to avoid
starvation until spring, when they could resume their campaign. Mormon raiders managed to burn three wagon trains
sent to supply the expedition, destroying three months’ provisions and bringing
federal troops to the brink of starvation.
Young added insult to injury by offering to provide the embattled U.S.
troops with salt, flour, and cattle.
(Arrington and Bitton)
Although they were no longer on the trail,
life was far from easy for the troops. The food was terrible and there wasn't
much of it. Lacking work animals, the men had to muscle sleds and wagons to
bring in firewood. Continued Mormon harassment required soldiers to stand
constant guard at lonely pickets far from their tents and fires.
Military drills continued throughout the
winter. … In their free time, the men gambled, drank and wrote letters
grumbling about conditions, or boasting about imaginary battles with Mormons,
or keeping a stiff upper lip for the sake of their families. (Parshall)
As for the Mormons, the situation was not quite so
anxious, at least for the rest of the winter:
On the Mormon side, a few men were assigned
to watch the federal encampment and report any unexpected movement. The rest of
the Nauvoo Legion returned home to care for their families and thresh the heavy
grain harvest. Salt Lake City was remarkably calm that winter, with the usual
round of parties, theatricals and church services. Except for regular militia
drills and the oft-expressed resolve not to submit again to the wrongs of
Missouri and Illinois, Utah showed no sign of a people at war with an army
encamped little more than 100 miles away." (ibid)
About this time, with the elements and
circumstances having stopped Johnston’s Army, many of the Mormon’s felt quite
comfortable. They felt secure that God
was on their side, and the elements and the mountains were evidence of this:
Strong in the power of Brigham's God,
Your name's a terror to our foes;
Ye were a barrier strong and broad
As our high mountains crowned with snows.
Your name's a terror to our foes;
Ye were a barrier strong and broad
As our high mountains crowned with snows.
Sing!
fellow-soldiers in our cause,
For God will show his mighty hand:
Zion shall triumph, and her laws
The standard be to every land. (Mills, W.G.)
For God will show his mighty hand:
Zion shall triumph, and her laws
The standard be to every land. (Mills, W.G.)
A group of about 150 young men wintered in
Echo Canyon, and the rest returned home. None of the histories of Isaac give an
idea with which group he was. He was single, so would have been a good
candidate to stay the winter in the mountains.
With the army being forced to encamp, everyone was able
to take a second look at the reasons for war:
Public opinion in the East, which had at first supported
the Utah expedition, now turned sour. The press asked why military leaders had
not arranged to reinforce and resupply the beleaguered soldiers before real
suffering occurred. They demanded to know the total cost of the expedition.
Some who had urged the sending of an army in the spring were now asking why
Buchanan had not first sent an investigative commission to Utah.” (Parshall)
When Governor Cummings arrived on the scene, he felt his
appointment as governor was the most important thing, not that the Mormons be
punished, or defeated militarily. Thomas
Kane, a friend of the Mormons offered his services. “Kane offered to go
to Utah and negotiate a peaceful solution. While Buchanan gave Kane no official
commission and no public endorsement, he did offer lukewarm encouragement and
did nothing to prevent Kane's quixotic mission… Kane embarked on his voyage just as 1858
began, traveling by ship to Panama and by wagon across the isthmus, then by
ship to California and by horseback to Utah, arriving in Salt Lake City on Feb.
24.” (Parshall)
Buchanan’s position started to mellow:
…The official position emanating from Washington had already begun to
change. Through Colonel Thomas L. Kane,
Young had initiated peace feelers. While
Kane was sailing to California to mediate between Governor Cumming, Young, and
Colonel Johnston, Buchanan dispatched a presidential peace commission overland,
an action motivated mainly by congressional unrest over the vast amount of
money and manpower being used to provision and reinforce the Utah
Expedition. Both Young and Buchanan,
therefore, now sought a peaceful settlement.
(See Arrington and Bitton)
While negotiations were still in process, Young decided
on a dramatic gesture. This was a
decision to “move South,” to abandon the entire northern sweep of the territory
to the army, leaving men behind with instructions to set fire to any settlement
the soldiers made moves to occupy. Hosea
Stout recorded the decision in his diary:
Thursday 18 March 1858: Attended a general
Council at the Historians office of the first Presidency, Twelve, and officers
of the Legion. The object which was to
take into consideration the enemies, whether to attack them before they came
near us or wait until they come near, or whether it is yet best to fight only in
unavoidable defense or in case a large force is sent against us this spring
whether to fight or burn our houses and destroy everything in and around us and
flee to the mountains and deserts.
It appears that the course pursued
hitherto by Gov Young in baffling the oppressive purposes of Prest Buchanan has
redounded to the honor of Gov Young and the Saints and equally to the disgrace
of the President & his cabinet. Mormonism
is on the ascendancy and now what is the best policy to maintain that
ascendency. If we whip out and use up the few troops at Bridger will not the
excitement and sympathy which is now raising in our favor in the states, be
turned against us. Whereas if we only
annoy and impede their progress while we "Burn up" and flee, the
folly, and meanness of the President will be the more apparent and he and his
measures more unpopular &c. This was
about a fair statement of the subject matter in council. There was no definite measures adopted. Many spoke on the subject and the council
adjourned till 8th April at 2 p.m. at the Tabernacle.
Sunday 21 March 1858. Attended meeting at the Tabernacle which meeting was resolved into a
special Conference for the transaction of business.
The subject matter was "fleeing to the" deserts and mountains. It was decided to send 500 families from this city immediately to be selected from among those who had never been driven from their homes and from that class to take the poorest and most helpless. This 500 was to be selected by the Bishops from the several wards.
The plan of Emigration being thus established in this city was to be an ensample other cities, wards and settlements throughout the Territory; North more particularly. The precise destination was not made known as yet. (Stout)
The subject matter was "fleeing to the" deserts and mountains. It was decided to send 500 families from this city immediately to be selected from among those who had never been driven from their homes and from that class to take the poorest and most helpless. This 500 was to be selected by the Bishops from the several wards.
The plan of Emigration being thus established in this city was to be an ensample other cities, wards and settlements throughout the Territory; North more particularly. The precise destination was not made known as yet. (Stout)
Brigham Young was attempting to play on the sympathies of
the American public. Adopting the
“Sebastopol plan,” which had served a similar purpose during the Crimean War. Young was attempting to muster some national
sympathy while demonstrating that the Mormons were not willing to submit to a
blatant military occupation of their homes.
Throughout the spring the Mormons streamed south to temporary
encampments near Provo and farther south.”
(Arrington and Bitton)
As spring came on, the defensive positions in Echo Canyon
were retaken. Hosea Stout recorded,
“Wednesday 31 March 1858, 500 troops that is 400 foot and 100 Horse are
being sent to Echo again to meet the emergency which may arise.” (Stout)
Isaac did not have a horse, nor history riding, so would have been on
foot:
As the spring thaw
began in 1858, Johnston prepared to receive reinforcements that would bring his
force to almost 5,000—a third of the entire U.S. Army. At the same time, Young
initiated what has become known as the Move South, an exodus of some 30,000
people from settlements in northern Utah. Before leaving Salt Lake City,
Mormons buried the foundation of their temple, their most sacred building, and
planted wheat to camouflage it from the invaders' eyes. A few men remained
behind, ready to put houses and barns and orchards to the torch to keep them
out of the soldiers' hands. The Mormons, it seemed, would be exterminated or
once again driven from their land.
(Roberts 2)
Of note is that several Mormons were among General
Johnston’s force of 5000. Among these
was William Ashton, who would later become Isaac’s father-in-law. He had enlisted in the infantry at Fort
Laramie. He was held in reserve, and
eventually bypassed Salt Lake being ordered to California.
Meanwhile, Governor Cumming made a trip to the Salt lake
Valley, assured himself there was no rebellion, and returned to Camp Scott, the
bivouac at Fort Bridger. (Arrington and
Bitton) When he visited the valley, he
saw the first of the move south:
Cumming arrived just in time to witness the
most dramatic episode of the Utah War: Faced with the knowledge that the army
would inevitably enter the settlements in the spring, the Mormons withdrew from
Salt Lake City and all northern towns, taking refuge in Provo and other points
south.
Cumming was greeted by the sight of
families, with their household goods piled on wagons and their livestock
trailing behind, fleeing southward. All the stored wheat, all the church
records, the benches from the tabernacle, the Deseret News press, and
the doors and windows from all of the houses, along with every other
salvageable article, had been cached or sent south. (Parshall)
In April, agreement was reached that the expedition would
be allowed to march through Salt Lake City and establish a position some forty
miles distant from which it could ensure the rights of the presidential
appointees without seeming to “occupy Mormon territory.” In June, after announcing that Buchanan had
granted the Mormons “free and full pardon,” the new territorial officers and an
escort of more than fifty-five hundred soldiers, teamsters, and suppliers
marched through the abandoned streets of Salt Lake City. To the south, some thirty thousand Mormon
faithful waited, fearful that their homes might be either occupied or
destroyed. Nothing of the kind
occurred. The Utah Expedition marched
beyond the city and across the Jordan River to Cedar Valley, some forty miles
south of Salt Lake City. There they
established Camp Floyd, named in honor of the Secretary of War who had
supported the mission.
However, by the time the peace was in place, and the army
marched through Salt Lake, the population had moved south:
That same month, Johnston and his troops
marched through the deserted streets of Salt Lake City—then kept marching 40
miles south to establish Camp Floyd, in present-day Fairfield, Utah. With the
Army no longer a threat, the Mormons returned to their homes and began a long
and fitful accommodation to secular rule under a series of non-Mormon
governors. (Roberts 2)
By the time Buchanan's official peace
commissioners arrived in Utah with power to negotiate a settlement and bearing
a pardon for actions committed by Utah's defenders, the move south was
complete. The army entered Salt Lake Valley on June 26, 1858, to find an eerily
deserted city. A few men watched from behind empty buildings, ready to burn the
city if one soldier broke ranks to steal so much as a single peach from a
Mormon orchard.
It took hours for the army to march through,
strung out as they were along the road, but Johnston had drilled and
disciplined the troops so well that they passed without incident, first to camp
near the Jordan River and eventually to build Camp Floyd west of Utah Lake.
The displaced Mormons returned to their
homes by the end of July 1858. Aside from some verbal sparring and a few rowdy
incidents between soldiers and civilians - generally minor, but including one
murder - Mormon settlers and their military neighbors tended to ignore one
another. (Parshall)
The peaceable
march of the army through Salt Lake City, the unopposed installation of Cumming
as governor, and the subsequent return of the Mormons to their abandoned farms
and homes ended a confrontation that had been heralded as apocalyptic but had
always had something of the incongruity of comic opera. The President of the United States had
dispatched the largest peacetime army in the nation’s history to oversee the
installation of half a dozen officials in a minor territory. He had done so without thorough investigation
of charges made by a few disgruntled or economically interested
individuals. He had neglected to notify
the Mormons or to inquire after their viewpoint, until nearly a year after the
expedition was sent. The Mormons, in
turn, had once more been uprooted from their homes, interrupted in their
development of the territory, and labeled a rebellious people. (Stout from Arrington and Bitton)
It was miraculous that the Utah Expedition did not end in
a bloodbath. Unleashing military force
is always easier than restraining it, and for the Mormons to attempt harassment
of the invaders and destruction of supply trains while avoiding the taking of
life and open battles was, on the face of it, a delicate combination that would
not seem to have much chance of success.
Yet there were practically no casualties except from frostbite and
exposure. (Arrington and Bitton)
David Robert provides this summary from the New York Herald
June 19, 1858, “Killed, none; wounded, none; fooled, everybody.” (Roberts 2)
“Although there were only minor skirmishes
between scouting parties, the war was not the bloodless farce of popular
perception. Men froze to death, died of disease, were shot and hanged and
bludgeoned in little-known atrocities. The hardships of war also affected
Mormon women, children and the elderly.” (Parshall)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
