Freedom
National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861-1865,
by: James Oakes, W.W. Norton and Company, New York, 2013.
This
is a fascinating book about the progression towards the liberation of
the slaves. The basic story we have is that Lincoln signed the
Emancipation Proclamation, after the Union achieved a victory of sorts
at Antietam, and then the slaves were free. Lincoln went on to get the
thirteenth amendment through congress, which was eventually accepted by
the states. Some of the former Confederate States accepted it as it
was now the law of the land, or less than full hardy, but in the end,
slavery was no more.
However,
the truth is that the emancipation of the slaves was a gradual process.
Without the secession of the Southern States, it probably would have
taken much longer, but the war gave the government, and Abraham Lincoln
and the Republican party a reason to emancipate the slaves. First,
slaves escaped to the Union lines, and eventual the policy became, the
army would not return slaves would could be conscripted to help the
Southern cause, but would be employed to help the North. Also of
immediate import was the ending of the Fugitive Slave Act with regards
to those states that had seceded. The agreement was no longer binding
with those states who were no longer under the Constitution.
The
policy as such lead to people to self emancipate, but running to the
army, or by running to free states. When the Union invaded Louisiana,
this again lead to slaves running to Union lines.
Federal
policy progressed slowly. Next is was slaves from seceded states who
were no longer returned, rather than just those whose masters fought for
the rebel cause or used the slaves for the rebel cause. The
emancipation proclamation was President Lincoln taking advantage of the
powers given him by the war powers Act which basically asked for a
proclamation.
The
Emancipation Proclamation did two things, emancipated those slaves in
Union controlled territory from seceded states. It also allowed for
former slaves to fight for the army, which had not been done to this
point, January 1, 1835. over 180,000 would fight for the Union. At the end of the war the accounted for 20 percent of the soldiers in arms.
However,
this proclamation wasn’t enough. Slaves in border states still loyal
to the Union were not freed. It was hoped these states would abolish
slavery on their own, but this was not happening and when it did happen,
the process was slow. Louisiana and West Virginia were progressing to
abolish slavery, and other states were coming along like Missouri;
however Kentucky and Delaware were having none of it.
A
broader approach was needed. This was found in an amendment to the
Constitution—which was rare to this point in time. In fact, the first
attempt failed in the congress. However, after the election, but before
the new congressmen came into office (the election had been a
Republican success and passage was assured after the new congress was
sworn in.) However they wanted passage as soon as possible, and before
the end of the war, which may change people’s ideas about the need for
the amendment.
The
Democratic argument against emancipation was two-fold, the government
should not interfere with property rights; property in men in this
case. The second was the racist argument, the freed slaves were
inferior and would be a burden upon themselves and other people without
masters to care for them. On the other hand, the Republicans argued
that there was no such thing as property in people, or shouldn’t be.
They also argued that free people would find a way to contribute to
society.
For
everyone’s benefit, the Republicans prevailed and Freedom was the law,
all across the land. At this time, equal rights should have been the
next step. However, after Lincoln was killed, this step was not taken,
and our nation still wallowed in racial segregation and lack of voting
and other basic rights for many years.
No comments:
Post a Comment