Topics that interest me include, California Mormon history, Mormon Handcart history, WWII history, Civil War history
Labels
- 9/11
- Abraham Lincoln
- Adolf Hitler
- African American History
- Argentina
- Bear Flag Revolt
- Bear River Battle
- Book Review
- Book of Mormon
- Brigham Young
- California History
- California Indians
- California Missions
- Civil War
- Donner Party
- Emancipation Proclamation
- English history
- Eva Peron
- Frederick Douglass
- Gettysburg
- Gettysburg Address
- Ghost Dance
- Gold Star Mothers
- Halloween
- Hyrum Crusader
- Hyrum Utah
- Inca
- Isaac Wardle
- Jewish Holocaust
- Joseph Smith
- Ken Burns
- Korean War
- Manteca
- Martin Handcart Company
- Memorial Day
- Mormon Battalion
- Mormon Trail
- Mormon handcart rescuers
- Mormon history
- Mormon music
- Mormon pioneers
- Mormons
- Mormons in England
- Native American Art
- Native American History
- Native American Prophecies
- Native American Prophets
- Native American biographies
- Native Americans
- New Hope
- Olympics
- Pearl Harbor
- Pioneers
- Railroad
- Reorganized Church
- San Joaquin
- San Joaquin City
- San Joaquin River
- South Jordan
- Sports
- The West
- The church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- U.S. History
- U.S. Navy
- Utah history
- WWI
- WWII
- archeology
- assassination
- basketball
- biography
- cache valley
- civil rights
- documentary
- emancipation
- ghost towns
- gold rush
- handcart companies
- handcart pioneer
- handcart rescuers
- historical documentary
- historical reenactment
- motivational movies
- movie review
- music
- philately
- sports movies
- weapons
- women
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Book review: California 24/7: Amazing Photographs of an Extraordinary State
This is one of a series of books, documenting a week in the the life of a state. The original book was America 24/7. This book was published in 2004. it was put together by Rick Smolan and David Elliot Cohen. It has an interested idea, but I think it is impossible to document all of California, because it is so diversified. However, this book seems to focus on parts of California that are on the fringe. It shows many tatoes, The views of homeless people are over done, although that is a part of our state. It mentions the bull frog races of Angel's Camp made famous by Mark Twain. It shows the country life, and men who are in rodeo; but at the same time shows the surfer community. It shows Marin boot camp, where Mark was but we weren't able to see. It showed a knee kicking contest used to wear the warriors out so they could learn self defense when they were exhausted. It shows industry, and technology, and religion, and a thousand other views. It is impossible to take it all in.
Monday, February 16, 2015
Biography: Toypurina
Toypurina: I take this from an article in the Metro. It is based on a book by Elias Castillo “A Cross of Thorns: The Enslavement of California’s Indians by the Spanish Missions.” It appears he also wrote this article for the Metro.
Toypurina was a young Native American maiden with some beauty. She was a child when the California missions were established. She saw herself and her people go from having plenty of food, and a way of life with considerable freedom. Even though she did not join the missions, she saw the change on the people in general. She herself was of the Gabrielino Tribe; which tribe did not, for the most part, convert to Catholocism and join the missions.
When Toypurina was a young woman, she lead a revolt against the missions. The hope was for several missions to overthrow the Franciscans and kill them. She is the only North American Native American woman to lead a revolt. She consulted with Nicolas Jose someone who had converted, and lived inside the mission; but had become disaffected with it because native dances were not allowed. Together they recruited several tribal groups to participate in the uprising. They selected Mission San Gabriel as the first place of attack, and the night of October 25 1785. There was much planning and coordination, and a Spanish soldier, who had taught himself the Tongva language, overheard the plans. He took his knowledge to the friars, who were able to use this against the Indians. Toypurina was considered a sorceress, and she had prophesized that the friars would all be found dead in their room. The friars hid elsewhere, while soldiers took their places in the rooms, pretending to be dead. When the Indian warriors rushed to their room, and found them dead, the felt they had victory. However when the dead friars came back to life, and were joined by soldiers, the warriors fled in fear, and the revolt was thwarted. Toypurina, Jose, and a couple chiefs were taken prisoner and put on trial for their revolt.
Toyurina’s initial response was, “I hate the padres and all of you for living here on my native soil, for trespassing on the land of my forefathers and despoiling our tribal domains.” However as the trial progressed, Toypurina’s attitude changed. She was a beautiful woman of 24 years. When she softened, she was kept at the mission for a year to assure her repentance was genuine. She converted to Christianity and was baptized. SHe was exiled to a different mission, where she married a Spanish soldier. They eventually moved to Mission San Juan Bautista, where she passed away and is buried.
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Book Review: Stubby the War Dog
Stubby
the War Dog: the True Story of World War I’s Bravest Dog, by: Ann
Bausum, National Geographic Kids, Washington, D.C., 2014.
This
is a very interesting story of a man and his canine friend. Stubby
adopted R. Robert Conroy while he was dong basic training as a volunteer
for the Army in WWI. They were training at the athletic grounds at
Yale University. Stubby began to hand around the army trainees,
particularly the kitchen staff, hoping for a bone or something to eat.
He was a mutt, but mostly of Boston Terrier extraction. He befriended
Conroy and they became best friends. The dog trained along with the
men. He actually could sit on his haunches and salute, and he march and
present right or left with the men.
However
eventually, the army moved out headed to the war. The left Stubby
behind, but Stubby would have none of it and followed the men. He
hopped aboard the rail car on his own, and no one stopped him. However
to take him aboard the ship headed to Europe would be breaking rules.
Conroy hatched a plan to have a sympathetic crew member sneak him
aboard. The plan was successful, and after they were well on their way
the brought him out of hiding and no one seem to mind. The commanding
officer spotted the animal, but Stubby won him over with a salute.
Thus
Stubby became a war dog. War is not safe. Conroy had to fit an air
mask for him. On one occasion Stubby was wounded by shrapnel, and was
evacuated as the wounded men. Stubby of course healed form his wound.
Stubby
performed many jobs, including being the mascot for his unit. He would
lie by the men as the slept, he helped the medics locate wounded, and
at times would stay by a wounded man until the medics arrived, or until
the man passed away, giving them some comfort in their final moments.
At times he and Conroy would help with delivering messages.
Stubby
had a knack for being able to distinguish Germans from Americans. He
is credited with capturing a German officer, who was perhaps a spy. He
took an Iron Cross from this officer which Conroy placed on his jacket
over his rear end. Stubby had a special jacket, which eventually
included many medals and honors. I don’t think any dog from the war was
as decorated.
Friday, November 28, 2014
Documentary Review: Cropsey: The Truth is Terrifying
Cropsey: The Truth is Terrifying, A film form Barbara Brancaccio and Joshua Zeman, Vicious Circle Films, 2009.
Staten Island is portrayed in this documentary as a place where historically, all the trash from New York ends. This includes physical as well as human trash. In its time there were many state institutions on Staten Island, including mentally ill hospitals as well as hospital for the profoundly developmentally delayed. At one point this lead to investigation of the conditions in the hospital and a big scandal.
There is a long tradition of Cropsey, a local bogey man legend. It is said Cropsey is a former mental patient who preys on the unsuspecting when they wander into the woods.
Then the movie goes into telling the story of Andre Rand. Rand is a former employer at one of these hospitals that was closed. He is also a convicted child kidnapper and murderer. He has been convicted in the disappearance of two children on Staten Island. He is suspected in the disappearance of many more children. These children are generally those who are easy victims, developmentally delayed or challenged in some other way.
Rand has never divulged the location of any of his victims. One of them was found. Because of the lack of evidence, there are still many lost children from Staten Island.
Staten Island is portrayed in this documentary as a place where historically, all the trash from New York ends. This includes physical as well as human trash. In its time there were many state institutions on Staten Island, including mentally ill hospitals as well as hospital for the profoundly developmentally delayed. At one point this lead to investigation of the conditions in the hospital and a big scandal.
There is a long tradition of Cropsey, a local bogey man legend. It is said Cropsey is a former mental patient who preys on the unsuspecting when they wander into the woods.
Then the movie goes into telling the story of Andre Rand. Rand is a former employer at one of these hospitals that was closed. He is also a convicted child kidnapper and murderer. He has been convicted in the disappearance of two children on Staten Island. He is suspected in the disappearance of many more children. These children are generally those who are easy victims, developmentally delayed or challenged in some other way.
Rand has never divulged the location of any of his victims. One of them was found. Because of the lack of evidence, there are still many lost children from Staten Island.
Friday, November 14, 2014
Book Review: Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861-1865
Freedom
National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861-1865,
by: James Oakes, W.W. Norton and Company, New York, 2013.
This
is a fascinating book about the progression towards the liberation of
the slaves. The basic story we have is that Lincoln signed the
Emancipation Proclamation, after the Union achieved a victory of sorts
at Antietam, and then the slaves were free. Lincoln went on to get the
thirteenth amendment through congress, which was eventually accepted by
the states. Some of the former Confederate States accepted it as it
was now the law of the land, or less than full hardy, but in the end,
slavery was no more.
However,
the truth is that the emancipation of the slaves was a gradual process.
Without the secession of the Southern States, it probably would have
taken much longer, but the war gave the government, and Abraham Lincoln
and the Republican party a reason to emancipate the slaves. First,
slaves escaped to the Union lines, and eventual the policy became, the
army would not return slaves would could be conscripted to help the
Southern cause, but would be employed to help the North. Also of
immediate import was the ending of the Fugitive Slave Act with regards
to those states that had seceded. The agreement was no longer binding
with those states who were no longer under the Constitution.
The
policy as such lead to people to self emancipate, but running to the
army, or by running to free states. When the Union invaded Louisiana,
this again lead to slaves running to Union lines.
Federal
policy progressed slowly. Next is was slaves from seceded states who
were no longer returned, rather than just those whose masters fought for
the rebel cause or used the slaves for the rebel cause. The
emancipation proclamation was President Lincoln taking advantage of the
powers given him by the war powers Act which basically asked for a
proclamation.
The
Emancipation Proclamation did two things, emancipated those slaves in
Union controlled territory from seceded states. It also allowed for
former slaves to fight for the army, which had not been done to this
point, January 1, 1835. over 180,000 would fight for the Union. At the end of the war the accounted for 20 percent of the soldiers in arms.
However,
this proclamation wasn’t enough. Slaves in border states still loyal
to the Union were not freed. It was hoped these states would abolish
slavery on their own, but this was not happening and when it did happen,
the process was slow. Louisiana and West Virginia were progressing to
abolish slavery, and other states were coming along like Missouri;
however Kentucky and Delaware were having none of it.
A
broader approach was needed. This was found in an amendment to the
Constitution—which was rare to this point in time. In fact, the first
attempt failed in the congress. However, after the election, but before
the new congressmen came into office (the election had been a
Republican success and passage was assured after the new congress was
sworn in.) However they wanted passage as soon as possible, and before
the end of the war, which may change people’s ideas about the need for
the amendment.
The
Democratic argument against emancipation was two-fold, the government
should not interfere with property rights; property in men in this
case. The second was the racist argument, the freed slaves were
inferior and would be a burden upon themselves and other people without
masters to care for them. On the other hand, the Republicans argued
that there was no such thing as property in people, or shouldn’t be.
They also argued that free people would find a way to contribute to
society.
For
everyone’s benefit, the Republicans prevailed and Freedom was the law,
all across the land. At this time, equal rights should have been the
next step. However, after Lincoln was killed, this step was not taken,
and our nation still wallowed in racial segregation and lack of voting
and other basic rights for many years.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Book Review: Mr. Lincoln’s High-Tech War
Mr.
Lincoln’s High-Tech War: How the North Used the Telegraph, railroads,
Surveillance Balloons, Iron-Clads, High-Powered Weapons and More to Win
the Civil War, by Thomas B. Allen and Roger MacBride Allen, National
Geographic, Washington, D.C., 2009.
This
book is more than just a talk of the weapons used in the war, although
it does provide some of that information. It is also a description of
some of the action in the war. For example, it has a very good
description of the first armored naval battle, between the Monitor and
the Merrimack or CSS Virginia. The Virginia had her day against the
Union wooden fleet the first day, but because she had a heavy draw,
low-tide was her enemy and she had to withdraw. The Captain and crew
expected to return the next day and finish a job on the wood ships,
after sinking one and damaging a couple more the previous day. However,
a new ship, a raft with a barrel on top, met them the next day, in
defense of the wooden vessels. This was the Monitor, with the first
turreted gun in history. The battle proved a draw, with both sides
trying to ram the others, and causing some damage to the iron sheeting.
However, again the Virginia had to withdraw because of the tide, and
nothing was resolved; except the Union fleet was now safe. Neither of
these vessels was very sea worthy, and their predecessors would be
better vessels. They did usher in a new age of sea warfare.
Other
chapters of interest; balloon reconnaissance should have been more
successful than it was. However, McClellan always but more faith in his
detectives than the information from the balloons, and they soon fell
out of favor.
Advances
in rifles gave the union a big advantage. Breech loading weapons could
shoot more rapidly with the same accuracy. Rifling made traditional
warfare obsolete, as generals discovered early in the war, with
excessive casualties.
Other technology includes advances in canon, use of rail and telegraph.
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Book Review: Celebrating Halloween
Celebrating Halloween by: Wendy Mass, Enslow Publishers Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, 2006.
This
is a very complete book about the history of Halloween, in fact it may
be a little too complete. It does bring in a lot of different
celebrations, similar to Halloween and making memorial of the deceased
into the discussion. It also talks about the period of vandalism which
accompanied Halloween before Halloween turned more to a party and trick
or treating like today. Many different celebration have come to mark
Halloween, including Druid influence, Roman influence, Catholic and
Church of England influences. The story of Jack who was abandoned
between heaven and hell, the story of Guy Fawkes, who attempted to blow
up parliament, the significance of bonfires and pumpkins. This book
talks about the part mischief making played, as well as the part of
costumes. This started as an attempt to make yourself look like a
spirit so the spirits wouldn’t bother you. It has also been influenced
by masquerades, and more recently people have costumes of their favorite
character.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)